Carbon Copies, Contradictions, and the Negation of Bureaucracy

Panini was born into a poor Telugu Brahmin family, with more siblings than shirts and fewer meals than arguments. His first ambition was modest: to be adopted by a rich family. That never happened, so he stayed in school—thin from hunger, reckless from curiosity, distracted by beauty. His English teacher was dazzling: her face more enchanting than any grammar lesson. He spent so much time gazing at her that he failed English—not from ignorance, but from infatuation.

At school, he carried the triple curse of being small, poor, and inquisitive. He asked too many questions, poked holes in weak explanations, and refused to let nonsense pass unchallenged. Teachers found him insolent, bullies found him irresistible. Punishments multiplied whether he was guilty or not.

Then came his first dialectical breakthrough—discovered not in Marx, but in stationery. One day, he found carbon paper. During exams, he slipped a sheet beneath his answer page, making a duplicate. That copy he passed to the class’s biggest but dullest boys. They copied his answers, passed their exams, and in return became his bodyguards. The daily beatings stopped. His enemies were beaten instead. The scrawny Brahmin boy who had been everyone’s punching bag suddenly ruled the playground. He learned early that terror could be subcontracted and that power, like ink, could be duplicated.

He didn’t yet know the word “dialectics,” but he practiced it instinctively—the art of reversing relations, of turning weakness into strength. Later, he encountered it in theory. His older brother was in Hyderabad’s Communist Party, and through him Panini sat in on meetings where dialectics was taught like scripture. For the first time, he heard the sacred names—Marx, Engels, Lenin—and the logic of contradictions explained as the motor of history.

But the men who preached dialectics disliked it when he used it. They adored their leaders more than logic, quoted Marx like priests reciting mantras, and grew uneasy when their faith was examined. Panini, armed with their own vocabulary, turned their tools against them. He exposed contradictions not between classes but within comrades. The self-proclaimed revolutionaries grew hostile to the heretic who out-reasoned them. He had learned another truth: institutions hate their own principles when practiced sincerely.

History carried him next to Iran, where he worked as a clerk for an Italian construction company in Bandar Abbas, helping build the country’s largest port. The Italians were gracious, the Iranians courteous, but the fiercest hostility came from Indian and Pakistani Muslims at the site—especially those from Hyderabad. They tried to humiliate him. His Iranian boss, a Muslim himself, noticed. With one bureaucratic gesture, he revoked their work permits and sent them home. The balance of power flipped. Once again, the bullied boy became feared and respected—not through violence, but through paperwork. Bureaucracy, when wielded dialectically, can be deadlier than fists.

Then came the Iranian Revolution. Panini never worked for the Ayatollahs, but he lived through a country suddenly ruled by them—where revolutions devoured jobs like fire consumes dry leaves. Fortune blinked his way again: an American visa.

Landing in New York felt like stepping onto another planet. Skyscrapers rose like steel cathedrals, people walked as if pursued by time, and the city’s legendary rudeness felt almost refreshing after years of ideological politeness. In New York, everyone questioned everything. No one was sacred.

Panini landed the most prestigious job New York could offer him—a lunch delivery boy in a Midtown hamburger joint. Day after day, he carried paper bags of hamburgers, fries, and Diet Cokes through those glass cathedrals. He delivered lunch to Harry Winston, jeweler of kings; to Diane von Fürstenberg, queen of the wrap dress; and to Louis Nizer, courtroom legend.

Across 57th Street, another tower was rising. He often delivered food to its construction crews and sometimes to the manager himself—a brash, impatient man, but not unkind. His name was Donald J. Trump. Panini delivered him lunch often enough to be remembered. The tower became Trump Tower, and decades later its owner became the 45th and 47th president of the United States. Panini could truthfully say he once fed a future president—back when Trump’s hands reached for hamburgers, not ballots.

Marriage later drew him south, into America’s quieter latitudes. He joined an insurance company, just another foreign clerk lost in forms and signatures. But bureaucracy, like the classroom and the playground, invited dialectical subversion. He restructured the company’s information flow, eliminating waste and redundancy. The result: six million dollars in savings, millions more in efficiency. The company gave him a bonus; his middle-management colleagues gave him hatred. Bureaucracy was negated, but dialectics, as ever, demanded a cost—the annihilation of the comfortable and the exposure of the useless.

Then came September 11. Until that morning, Panini had been a bleeding-heart liberal, even working for one of the most famous politicians in the American South—a man who would later become his friend. But the next day altered his entire cosmology. He saw Islamic terror not as a regional nuisance but as a global negation—of reason, of civilization, of doubt itself. The boy who once delivered hamburgers to Trump Tower now supported its owner for president in 2016, 2020, and 2024.

Now retired, with three children and two grandchildren, Panini has returned to his first calling: philosophy. No more hamburgers or spreadsheets—just a basement, a keyboard, and the freedom to think without supervision. It is, he says, the best job in the world. No bosses, no slogans, no Party lines—only dialectics, logic, and the First and Second Amendments on his side (plus the local police, if debates turn violent).

What has Panini learned from this journey? That the world changes costumes but not character. In his schoolyard, bullies ruled until he flipped the script with carbon paper. In Hyderabad, Marxists preached contradictions but feared them in practice. In Iran, clerics replaced kings and called it revolution. In America, he saw bureaucracy outlive both ideology and intelligence. Power never disappears; it only changes hands—and sometimes uniforms.

Dialectics and logical empiricism may soothe the intellect, but practicing them invites exile. Dale Carnegie taught millions how to win friends; dialecticians lose them for sport. Sweet talk builds careers, but only reason unmasks power. Theological dogmas still kill by the tens of thousands. Only the twin weapons of contradiction and empiricism—not politeness—can fight them.

Better, then, to be the frail boy who became a terror with carbon paper than one more obedient casualty of bureaucracy.

–223–