Article23

The World Bleeds at the Altar of Revelation

Judaism, Christianity, and Islam sanctify contradiction, conquest, and eternal war—and humanity pays the price.The world’s most profound contradictions are not born of ethnicity but of theology, and nowhere is this clearer than in the fate of the Abrahamic faiths. Judaism, stripped of its metaphysical pretenses, collapses under the weight of Logical Empiricism. Its foundations rest on unverifiable claims of chosenness and covenant. What makes matters worse is that the Jews who dominate politics and culture today are largely secular Ashkenazis, people disconnected from the biblical bloodlines they invoke when convenient.
 They decry Nazism endlessly while replicating its tactics against Palestinians, using religion when useful, ethnicity when useful, and perpetual victimhood as political capital. The contradiction is not mine; it is theirs.
Christianity carved its legacy into the Americas with blood and fire. The conquistadors did not come as secular adventurers or neutral merchants but as self-declared soldiers of Christ, bearing crucifixes and papal decrees. They called their massacres conversions, their enslavement of indigenous peoples salvation, and their genocidal campaigns missions. 
It is hypocrisy of the highest order that these men paraded as pious saints while spreading smallpox and destruction. We cannot shift the blame onto Jews or Muslims here; they were not players in this particular conquest. It was Christian Europe alone that sanctified genocide as God’s will and called it holy. 

Islam presents itself as universal, but in practice, it is Arab imperialism disguised as religion. Ninety percent of Muslims today are non-Arabs, descendants of Hindus, Persians, Turks, Africans, and countless others who gained nothing from Islam but the erasure of their identities. 
The poor in the subcontinent still sell their possessions for one pilgrimage to Mecca, enriching the very Arab custodians who long ago imposed their theology by sword. Less than five percent of Muslim elites benefit materially from Islam, while the rest live as colonized minds, worshipping the language, geography, and supremacy of Arabs. To point this out is not racism, for Muslims come from every ethnicity; it is to reject monotheism in its crudest form, which chains whole civilizations to the service of a single desert tribe.The proof of Islam’s potency lies in terror. The vast majority of terrorist attacks in the modern world are committed by Muslims acting not as nationalists, not as revolutionaries, but as faithful believers. This is not an accident but a direct consequence of doctrine. Islam provides theological justification for violence in jihad and the promise of martyrdom, elevating murder into a sacred duty.
 The victims are not only the innocents killed in markets, temples, towers, and trains, but also the Muslims themselves, trapped in a system that teaches them to hate their neighbors and themselves.

No conflict embodies the pathology of the Abrahamic religion more than Israel and Palestine. It is not simply a territorial quarrel or a nationalist struggle; it is a theological feud between brothers, each clinging to sacred geography as if God Himself were a real estate agent. One side claims victimhood while wielding immense military power; the other clings to martyrdom as the only means of dignity. And because both sides believe eternity itself is at stake, the war can never end. This is not a political deadlock, but a theological stalemate —a permanent self-destruction born of revelation.

Contrast this with the wars of Hindus, Buddhists, Chinese, Mongols, or Japanese. Their wars were savage, but they were finite. They fought for land, power, and empire, but not for the souls of all humanity. They did not elevate conquest into theology or impose universality onto their victims. Their violence was nationalist or dynastic, not eternal. That is why Mumbai, a city of twenty-five million people drawn from a thousand ethnicities and dozens of religions, including millions of Muslims, can coexist in relative peace, while fifteen million Israelis and Palestinians are locked in perpetual war. The difference is not in ethnicity, but in theology.The Mumbai terrorist attacks drive this home. They were not the product of Hindu pluralism or Indian nationalism but of Semitic theology imported from Arabia. The gunmen were not Arabs but South Asians—descendants of Hindus who had abandoned their history, DNA, and culture, and imagined themselves as servants of the Arab Ummah. 

They struck not as sons of India but as self-colonized agents of Semitic absolutism, tearing into the very pluralism their ancestors once embodied. That night in Mumbai was not an Indian tragedy alone but the latest chapter in a long war between exclusivist monotheism and human plurality.

This is the pattern the world refuses to see. Dharmic violence may wound, but Semitic violence enslaves. One ends when kings die; the other persists because it is sanctified as eternal. The contradictions do not lie in pointing this out; they lie in the very religions and peoples who bend truth for convenience, theology for conquest, and victimhood for power. Until we name this clearly, the world will keep bleeding at the altar of revelation.