The Chainsaw India Refuses to Pick Up
Kashmir should have been enough to wake India up. For five thousand years it was Hindu and Buddhist—a land of temples, monasteries, and philosophers whose words shaped Asia. Today it is Muslim-majority, its Pandits exiled, its shrines defiled, its past erased. Demography is destiny, and destiny has no mercy. Once a land tips Islamic, it is Islamic forever. Afghanistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh—all testify to this law.
The tragedy is not that Hindus lacked wisdom. They had sages in abundance. The tragedy is that sages cannot stop mobs. No Baba, no Guru, no Shankara, no Nāgārjuna could defend India from conquest. Metaphysics is a lullaby; survival is a battlefield. Civilizations do not endure by chanting mantras, but by wielding weapons.
What India needs is a tool ugly, brutal, mechanical—but effective. A chainsaw. That chainsaw is Logical Empiricism. It is not a scripture, not a metaphysics, not another mystical fog. It is a machine for cutting through illusions. It demands proof where theology offers only dogma. And in that demand, every theology collapses.
Indians should not resist this import. They did not resist electricity, railroads, the internet. Logical Empiricism is the same: a technology for the mind, as necessary as power grids are for cities. To reject it is to choose darkness.
But the chainsaw alone is not enough. Someone must pick it up, fuel it, wield it. Reason without force is impotent; force without reason is blind. Together, they are invincible. That is why Logical Empiricism must be joined to militant Hindu nationalism—not as theology, but as civilization. Hindu means Indian. To say Hindu nationalism is to say India must survive as India, united, unafraid, militant in its defense.
The choice is simple. Pick up the chainsaw, or be consumed.
No Responses